Title of article:

Comparison of the body mass index to other methods of body fat evaluation in ethnic Japanese and Caucasian adolescent girls

Authors: Sampei MA, Novo NF, Juliano Y, Sigulem DM.
Journal: Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord, Mar 2001;25(3):400-8

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the body mass index (BMI) and its relationship with other methods of body fat evaluation in pre- and post-menarcheal, Japanese and Caucasian female adolescents, using two different cut-off points for obesity: 28% and 30%. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study with incomplete sampling, using the subject as the evaluation unit. SUBJECTS: A total of 436 Japanese and Caucasian female adolescents in two age groups: 10-11 (pre-menarcheal adolescent); and 16-17 (post-menarcheal adolescents). METHODS: For the BMI the cut-off point for thinness was set at the 5th percentile of the BMI distribution of the NCHS reference population and the cut-off point for overweight and obesity was set at the 85th percentile. Body composition was assessed using foot-to-foot bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), near-infrared interactance (NIR) and Slaughter skinfold equations (SKI). The statistical comparison of the methods was performed using the kappa agreement test and the McNemar disagreement test. RESULTS: In the 10- and 11-y-old girls, the BMI was considerably and significantly correlated with the other methods. The major agreements were: in Japanese adolescents BMI x NIR=82.3% (cut-off point of 28%), BMI x BIA=85.7% (cut-off point of 30%); in Caucasian adolescents BMI x NIR=80.7% (cut-off point of 28%), BMI x BIA=87.4% (cut-off point of 30%). The disagreement above the diagonal between BMI x NIR was higher within the two groups for both the cut-off points, revealing that the girls identified as obese by the BMI were considered eutrophic by NIR. In the 16- and 17-y-old adolescents, the BMI demonstrated low or no correlation with the other methods. Furthermore, it presented disagreements below the diagonal, revealing that the BMI identified fewer obese subjects than the other methods. CONCLUSION: Among the 10- and 11-y-olds, the BMI presented a good correlation with the other methods, independent of ethnicity. The BMI can therefore be used in place of these methods, although it may underestimate obesity. Among the 16- and 17-y-olds, the BMI presented low or no agreement with the other methods, suggesting that it is probably not a suitable index for this age-group in studies focusing on the identification of obesity. In such cases the choice of one of the other methods, depending on availability, cost or technical experience, may represent a better approach.

Comments and Key points

That is a rather long abstract. Here are some the useful tidbits.

They used the Tanita body fat monitor scale, which uses bioelectric impedance, foot-to-foot method. That's a scale that you can buy and use at home. I've seen other published research studies use it too. They quote "Some authors have demonstrated that the foot-to-foot method adopted in the present study presents good correlations with the methods of hydrostatic weight, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and the conventional method of BIA".

The study actually took place in Sao Paulo, Brazil, at a private school having Japanese and Caucasian girls as students. So this study is about girls only.

For 10 and 11-year old girls, the 30% body fat threshold was a good cut-off definition of obesity.

But for 16 and 17-year old girls, the 30% body fat threshold was reasonably satisfactory, but a 28% body fat threshold was a little better. There was no significant difference between Japanese and Caucasian girls.

The authors noted that "Asian individuals tend to have greater trunk/leg proportation, this could lead to a variation in the relationship between the BMI and the percentage of fat". In other words, maybe Japanese have shorter legs than North Americans. "Furthermore, various studies have shown that, for the same Body Mass Index, the percentage of fat in Asians is greater than it is in whites".

 

Review & comments by Steven B. Halls, MD, Last edited on: 23-June, 2008, Copyright.
Back to the scientific BMI articles index.